commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Math 2.1 based on RC2
Date Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:54:37 GMT
sebb wrote:
> On 26/03/2010, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 26/03/2010, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  > Tag:
>>  >  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC2/
>>
>>
>> Some files were missing SVN:EOL (applied to trunk)
>>
>>  1 missing AL header (applied to trunk).
>>
>>  Notice was still 2009 - fixed in trunk.
>>
>>
>>  >  Distributions:
>>  >  http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC2/
>>
>>
>> No SHA1 hashes, seems odd as the Mvn dist has them.
>>  (Not a blocker, can be added later)
>>
>>  Builds and tests OK on 1.5 and 1.6; I got one failure in one of the
>>  runs of RandomDataTest but that is just my luck!
>>
>>
>>  >  Maven artifacts:
>>  >  http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC2/maven/
>>
>>
>> However these do have both SHA1 and MD5 hashes.
>>
>>
>>  >  Documentation bundled with the binary distribution:
>>  >  http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC2/docs/
>>
>>
>> Looks good.
>>
>>
>>  >  Output of maven:site run against the source distribution:
>>  >  http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC2/site/
>>
> 
> The only download link seems to be on the home page.
> 
> It would be helpful to have another in the lhs menu, as is done by may
> other Commons components.

+1 to add this
> 
>> Not a blocker, but it's confusing to have the Javadocs for the
>>  previous releases near the top, and the Javadocs for 2.1 buried low
>>  down.
>>
>>  If possible, I would put the old docs under a separate heading much
>>  further down.
>>
>>  Also, does it make sense to publish the RAT report?
>>  Surely that is mainly (only) needed for release checking?
>>
>>
>>  >  Votes, please.  This vote will close in 72 hours, 0200 GMT 29-March 2010
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >  [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>  >  [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>  >  [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>
>>
>> -0 - missing AL header and Notice year.
>>
>>  Might also be an idea to remove the mantissa and experimental
>>  directory trees from the SVN tag, as they don't form part of the
>>  release?
>>
>>  Better yet, can we move them out of trunk, e.g. into a branch (or the
>>  bit bucket?)
>>
>>
>>  >  [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>  >
>>  >  Thanks!
>>  >
>>  >  Phil
>>  >
>>  >  P.S.: I would appreciate it if an OSGi expert could review the
>>  >  generated material in the jar manifest and assure us that we will
>>  >  not get complaints on its suitability.
>>  >
>>  >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>  >
>>  >
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message