commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [IO] Next version of IO - should this be 2.0?
Date Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:25:16 GMT
On 07/03/2010, nicolas de loof <nicolas.deloof@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyway, after troubles with ASM incompatibility between asm2 and asm3
>  releases I'd prefer to have a dedicated package name for a major API change.
>

However, that's not the issue here.

>
>
>  > > For such a change to be totally transparent we cannot rely on the
>  > > relocation feature of Maven, which has been discussed before. We would
>  > > have to change the package name, which I think was done in lang, from
>  > > org.apache.commons.io to org.apache.commons.io2.
>  >
>  > I'm sorry but having the build-tool/repository force a package rename is
>  > nuts.
>  >
>  > Niall
>  >
>  > >>
>  > >> Niall
>  > >>
>  > >>>> Niall
>  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>  >
>  >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message