Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57815 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2010 18:49:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2010 18:49:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 59091 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2010 18:49:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 58960 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2010 18:49:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 58950 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2010 18:49:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:49:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.218 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.218] (HELO mail-fx0-f218.google.com) (209.85.220.218) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:49:31 +0000 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so1137465fxm.10 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:49:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BxG4hXFgFS0PtcR8JNU6TTRfn3YexscgzTaG0PeweZQ=; b=Rsr8RMtd/kWZvDCPwiqMr5MMNrTS/jdVdO8vIuCy3PsWFsYPKEioq1h9Uh95vVmgbt YlonLwd6Ml50PRWistVhqz7R1vlKxAGpef4sxOwB69MbFfY/eGu3CrGT7y19cuggBsmD h95JTIfXhfHGfQWkqQbIC+/QpK8QUlodUxfIQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=tLl2LJWEUZSgtMLCnhRDD6qEOXg55Y+jTuTLXS6JPwweWWddgL3BbI9xNlehNSxbm/ GqhJtiSnmMFSlP/hfHs9wgkSLep4AEdgggFPu5WOHcPahFnM8RIBxSiqKaoNXhZ6K98S LBLic/H7pw4t5TsKf4uynSw4F4N5tE0yKSmg0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.190.137 with SMTP id x9mr1452035hbh.17.1266691749498; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:49:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <55afdc851002191542j793ac219p5f06acbe1c2277a4@mail.gmail.com> References: <55afdc851002191542j793ac219p5f06acbe1c2277a4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:49:09 +0000 Message-ID: <25aac9fc1002201049u7d067cd8y8046ea0d1386023a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.5 based on RC1 From: sebb To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 19/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: > The last release of Lang was in March 2008 and there have been quite a > few bug fixes and enhancements since then. Many of the changes in the > current trunk which are compatible have been backported to the Lang > 2.x branch to create this release. > > [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1 > [ ] -1 No, because... > > Lang 2.5 RC1 is available for review here: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.5-rc1/ > > Maven artifacts are here: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.5-rc1/maven/commons-lang/ > > Details of changes since 2.4 are in the release notes: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.5-rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.5-rc1/site/changes-report.html > > I have tested this with JDK 1.3 & 1.4 using ant and JDK 1.5 & 1.6 using maven2. > (note JVMRandom tests failed for JDK 1.3 & 1.4 - but I re-ran a couple > of times and both passed) > > > The tag is here: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_5_RC1/ > > Site: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.5-rc1/site/ > (note some *relative* links are broken and the 2.5 directories are > not yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed) > > Clirr Report (compared to 2.4): > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.5-rc1/site/clirr-report.html > > RAT Report: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.5-rc1/site/rat-report.html There seem to be rather a lot of test failures in the Continuum build. According to the test case these should only occur 1 in 1000 runs, but they are occurring much more frequently than that. I don't know if this is due to a test case error, or whether there is actually a bug. I don't think this is a blocker, but perhaps someone else could have a look and see if there is anything obvious that needs fixing. Cannot do a formal test of the RC at present; but hopefully can run my tests in about 24 hrs from now. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org