commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2
Date Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:05:00 GMT
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Bill Barker <billwbarker@verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "jean-frederic clere" <jfclere@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:48 PM
>> To: <dev@commons.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2
>>
>>> On 02/23/2010 09:02 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the
>>>> previous RC1 proposal.
>>>>
>>>> RC2 Release is here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/
>>>> Tag is here:
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If voted for a release the COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2 tag will
>>>> be copied to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2 and released as such.
>>>>
>>>> ---------------
>>>> [X] +1  I support this release
>>>
>>
>> Ok, so we have three people listed as developers for this project approving
>> the release, including the author of the three remaining disputed files. Can
>> we get a couple more votes, to actually release this?
>
> Is the objection to the -1 that the files should never contain the AL
> header, or is the objection that it shouldn't be a release blocker?

Scratch that - I see that the files have had headers added by Bill.

Sebb - I don't think this is a release blocker. The three Makefiles
are pretty piddly, and it's fixed for a subsequent version. Wondering
if you can reconsider on your -1.

Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message