Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57137 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2010 21:35:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2010 21:35:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 1299 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2010 21:35:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 1176 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2010 21:35:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 1128 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2010 21:35:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:35:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of paulus.benedictus@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.185] (HELO mail-iw0-f185.google.com) (209.85.223.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:34:55 +0000 Received: by iwn15 with SMTP id 15so9081586iwn.10 for ; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:34:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=dfyAjw0NcGQtajC2stxNUum806CCfLxrlwuEvKNZJfw=; b=Y3+iWqnDMB969twI0r//MGxfuvj7OSRs210/xsuItvojE2olZX+k9iHeFP21SBtCbe bsmdqY7s1synRUNxJ0Te2OSCLgRInZxEq0NMuk3OfjnZsPFxFO7hHUNMOlCaCstWG5nC 6nZ0abBg9r2z/YggOg7TxkPp43Mx5HiB0fqo8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TJa1pJcsHy24K2F9Z2fTue4/AwHVOPGJqVpTlfIpW/fWPTdHc+AP93MxyJo8F4oF7n 5xamJTywtsMQCP9ekmlxSW/sn14FP0HfFIlGJ3b4FRIoHZR2shGGnkQ/y25kc3zA97jE 8R0PCOFSU92s3OnmTP72RUDmcMs0RHXMYwKDU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paulus.benedictus@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.5.23 with SMTP id 23mr1998208ibt.45.1262468074002; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:34:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <31cc37361001021330i5bd49bc9h2546c085bab60655@mail.gmail.com> References: <31cc37360912300218h450c517es8170702e9ea8fa96@mail.gmail.com> <4B3F7E2E.6090108@gmail.com> <31cc37361001021002tcffdf3csec3468e527a35ef2@mail.gmail.com> <4B3F9444.9090301@gmail.com> <31cc37361001021330i5bd49bc9h2546c085bab60655@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:34:33 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 99a1833bb867e825 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lang][collections] Overlap; Collections thoughts From: Paul Benedict To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Henri, > I would be tempted to schedule major upgrade cycles, while having > minor ones run independently. Still tricky to do, and hurts > innovation. Then again - having a scheduled 'v4.0 of all Commons > components will now be available to be worked on' time might make > innovation happen more easily. I don't think the way Lang and Collections does their artifacts is a problem... BUT, I do say they stuff way too much stuff into a release. Their cycles are slow because they cram a mountain into each release. Rather, release often and release less. Do something like 20 issues a release and call it a day. Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org