Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of simone.tripodi@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.219.215 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=njktDdrzeF4Ee3dWX1Q1gbodClebBoXqwa09xI7G2f6y9IJ5OOk95ynqK9Cib6Mf3d
         SLtyecVabdU82Tn6rzRU7muiImJDbyAWfe7ZfByDHLJh+gneg1W5vHFKeIBYJZUl4g6m
         GUTwNrMKTwo8vrd6CSvb73ATLHNbTSefxkZiE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <31cc37361001072318x5882c95bmed0a45d683555b85@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4173dc211001060438q71135e41t734d6f8469cf4f57@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e75283b11001060502u7e8723d3w551eaf6a65004943@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4173dc211001060515u5345dc65s7b77a338f4ffe6a2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <31cc37361001061727k1c46d3c8ua02d70375c944f7d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4173dc211001062254y28d45330va6aa058a421f4dc3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e75283b11001070001p76bd6f9eta75018f2d3b03533@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4173dc211001070411y29d61c9co828448f8d155ee7d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ce1f2ea81001071147m3a3fb6acl450da1a1206a6995@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4173dc211001072257v177c4f45nfbe70e12d4d991a9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <31cc37361001072318x5882c95bmed0a45d683555b85@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:55:21 +0100
Message-ID: <4173dc211001080155k739d1cc6qe2f9035dc19a4f49@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New sandbox component: at-digester
From: Simone Tripodi <simone.tripodi@gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Henry,
thanks a lot for your hint!!! Since I already created (and started
committing code) on the sandbox on

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk

Can I branch the code here? Should I remove the existing stuff on the
target dir? Many thanks in advance, I'm sorry but I'm not familiar
with these procedures on commons.
Best regards!!!!
SImo

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> You should have the rights.
>
> Make the branch into the sandbox rather than inside digester. Something like:
>
> svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/digester-anno/
> svn cp -m "Branching into the sandbox for annotation changes to
> digester" https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/digester/trunk
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/digester-anno/branch-name
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Simone Tripodi
> <simone.tripodi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all, Jochen, Rahul,
>> thanks for your help, fine for me working on a branch, I'm more than
>> pleased to adopt the best solution that fits with the community needs
>> :)
>> I don't think I have the rights needed to branch the digester, can
>> anyone help me please? Many thanks in advance, more than appreciated!
>> Best regards, have a nice day!
>> Simo
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Simone Tripodi <simone.tripodi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Jochen,
>>>> sorry for the delay (I'm currently at office), I think it is better if
>>>> we involve Rahul Akolkar (CC-ed in the mail): I'm an ASF committer but
>>>> not a Digester neither Commons committer; in this scenario I propose
>>>> to let the community express the opinion in having this new feature
>>>> included in a next feature release, if they're interested I think it
>>>> could be good investing efforts on it.
>>> <snip/>
>>>
>>> I've been traveling for a couple of weeks (and mostly offline), but
>>> otherwise interested in these happenings.
>>>
>>> As I mentioned when you posted your proposal initially (not in a
>>> position to dig up a link to the archives), I think this feature has
>>> good merits in certain usecases and could even be included in the
>>> digester trunk when ready. Now that you have access to the Commons
>>> sandbox, I think its best to work on a digester branch in the sandbox
>>> (as suggested already by others) rather than treating it as a separate
>>> component. Having said that, whatever works best for you is fine to
>>> get the ball rolling here.
>>>
>>> Finally, were you a Commons committer already, the sandbox branch too
>>> would have been unnecessary (you could have worked on trunk itself).
>>>
>>> -Rahul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Let me know, have a nice day :)
>>>> Simo
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
>>>> <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Simone Tripodi <simone.tripodi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> very nice to meet you! I imported the digester as dependency since,
>>>>>> fortunately, I don't have to modify the existing code, but just adding
>>>>>> a new package that contains the new feature.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just adds to my concerns. If you are not even modifying existing code,
>>>>> one might even consider not to create a branch.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling!
>>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.google.com/profiles/simone.tripodi
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://www.google.com/profiles/simone.tripodi

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org