Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22332 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2009 11:43:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2009 11:43:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 91205 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2009 11:43:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 91073 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2009 11:43:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 91063 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2009 11:43:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:43:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of phil.steitz@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.24] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:43:01 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so1521967qwb.55 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:42:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SItBj393W35nFQCgplOcY8rHL5cbQoTDzvNFsKRaFNY=; b=TIFRaHNwS6DuweGDg8X/G49aT7N+lyK6Cg4Z0LPaLMlqndslT0yl22biGxF8wN8JGT TDrRQNVs4/EJBjYzLi86DpsbHBEhL92FEUaBEMQc7st3rIZLBN0Z6fIzur0vBZO9DQqL /3GvWGVG58bfItiWn6M18PosafOORa/HvrYK0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=YEENoDVMQjCBgxouT5wPsi0NuQXRHpY7EdaB/iF5R6F8Qk3tFlHSatzdJ0yJ9gQJJo Rf8KpqlNXxwn/CLZn/xxoqNDfj+BcPKuOC4YQkdW/DUX/zSCAJk0egYLr00aQttPdkY2 beYwotEYUx+9CF28kQfU6gJLppbzFKoD0wejM= Received: by 10.224.101.141 with SMTP id c13mr6409412qao.21.1260445360391; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:42:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from phil-steitzs-macbook-pro.local (c-76-99-90-47.hsd1.de.comcast.net [76.99.90.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm2134692qwb.42.2009.12.10.03.42.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:42:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B20DEAD.8040504@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:42:37 -0500 From: Phil Steitz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [dbcp] 1.3/1.4 RC1 available for review References: <4B1CE902.8050509@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Phil Steitz wrote: > >> I have prepared release candidates for DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. Please all >> interested parties have a look and test. If all goes well, I will >> kick off a release VOTE based on these artifacts in the next couple >> of days. I see these as really two sets of artifacts associated >> with one release, so I am inclined to just do one VOTE including >> both versions. If anyone disagrees with this, please speak up. I >> am happy to run two VOTEs. >> >> 1.3 (JDBC 3) version: >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/dbcp-1.3-rc1 >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/dbcp-1.3-rc1/site >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/dbcp-1.3-rc1/maven >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/dbcp/tags/DBCP_1_3_RC1/ > > Like Nial I changed geronimo-jta_1.1_spec to version 1.1. My compiler zoo > fails though for blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03, jrockit-jdk-1.4.2.16 and sun- > jdk-1.4.2.19. IMHO you must update the xerces version to a release that > contains the driver implementation in the Java-SPI (META-INF/services): Thanks, Jorg. I really appreciate your running this through "the zoo." Can you identify a suitable Xerces version? I am going to make this and the jta spec change and cut another RC. Thanks all for testing. Phil > > ========================== %< ================================ > Test set: org.apache.commons.jocl.TestJOCLContentHandler > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.047 sec > <<< FAILURE! > testObject(org.apache.commons.jocl.TestJOCLContentHandler) Time elapsed: > 0.006 sec > testPrimitives(org.apache.commons.jocl.TestJOCLContentHandler) Time > elapsed: 0 sec > testParse(org.apache.commons.jocl.TestJOCLContentHandler) Time elapsed: > 0.028 sec <<< ERROR! > org.xml.sax.SAXException: System property org.xml.sax.driver not specified > at > org.xml.sax.helpers.XMLReaderFactory.createXMLReader(XMLReaderFactory.java:90) > at > org.apache.commons.jocl.JOCLContentHandler.parse(JOCLContentHandler.java:339) > at > org.apache.commons.jocl.JOCLContentHandler.parse(JOCLContentHandler.java:271) > at > org.apache.commons.jocl.TestJOCLContentHandler.testParse(TestJOCLContentHandler.java:255) > ========================== %< ================================ > > Using IBM-JDK 1.4.2.13 the build and all tests with Ant 1.6.5 succeed, but I > get nevertheless those exceptions, I do not see, when running the other JDKs > with Maven: > > ========================== %< ================================ > [junit] org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedTrace$AbandonedObjectException: > DBCP object created 2009-12-08 23:03:07 by the following code was never > closed: > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedTrace.setStackTrace(AbandonedTrace.java:138) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedObjectPool.borrowObject(AbandonedObjectPool.java:81) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolingDataSource.getConnection(PoolingDataSource.java:106) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource.getConnection(BasicDataSource.java:1044) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.TestAbandonedBasicDataSource.testAbandoned(TestAbandonedBasicDataSource.java:65) > ========================== %< ================================ > > ========================== %< ================================ > [junit] org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedTrace$AbandonedObjectException: > DBCP object created 2009-12-08 23:03:07 by the following code was never > closed: > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedTrace.setStackTrace(AbandonedTrace.java:138) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedObjectPool.borrowObject(AbandonedObjectPool.java:81) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolingDataSource.getConnection(PoolingDataSource.java:106) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource.getConnection(BasicDataSource.java:1044) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.TestBasicDataSource.getConnection(TestBasicDataSource.java:44) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.TestAbandonedBasicDataSource.testAbandonedClose(TestAbandonedBasicDataSource.java:75) > ========================== %< ================================ > > ========================== %< ================================ > [junit] org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedTrace$AbandonedObjectException: > DBCP object created 2009-12-08 23:03:07 by the following code was never > closed: > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedTrace.setStackTrace(AbandonedTrace.java:138) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedObjectPool.borrowObject(AbandonedObjectPool.java:81) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolingDataSource.getConnection(PoolingDataSource.java:106) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource.getConnection(BasicDataSource.java:1044) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.TestBasicDataSource.getConnection(TestBasicDataSource.java:44) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.TestAbandonedBasicDataSource.testAbandonedCloseWithExceptions(TestAbandonedBasicDataSource.java:101) > ========================== %< ================================ > > I do not see those using IBM-JDK 1.5.0.10. With this I had a casually 1 > failure, but no test reports are generated with Ant nor could I see on the > console which test actually failed. > > Additionally the Ant build filters-out the JDBC4 stuff ?!? I thought it's > not there in 1.3. > >> 1.4 (JDBC 4) version: >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/dbcp-1.4-rc1 >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/dbcp-1.4-rc1/site >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/dbcp-1.4-rc1/maven >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/dbcp/tags/DBCP_1_4_RC1/ > > Builds from source and runs tests with IcedTea6 1.6.2, Sun JDK 1.6 and Sun > JDK 1.7.0.0.alpha69 (add to README.txt ?!?). However it fails with IBM > 1.6.0.6: > > ========================== %< ================================ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Test set: org.apache.commons.dbcp.managed.TestBasicManagedDataSource > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tests run: 46, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.398 sec > <<< FAILURE! > testReallyClose(org.apache.commons.dbcp.managed.TestBasicManagedDataSource) > Time elapsed: 0.066 sec <<< FAILURE! > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Expecting SQLException - XAResources > orphaned > at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47) > at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.managed.TestBasicManagedDataSource.testReallyClose(TestBasicManagedDataSource.java:72) > ========================== %< ================================ > >> Release notes (common version, ships with both) >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >> >> There is also a recently opened documentation bug (DBCP-309) that I >> do not see as a showstopper for this release, but would appreciate >> feedback on the ticket and concurrence that we can push it to >> 1.3.1/1.4.1. > > The build setup itself looks good though, except a minor nit: > > ========================== %< ================================ > [WARNING] While downloading xml-apis:xml-apis:2.0.2 > This artifact has been relocated to xml-apis:xml-apis:1.0.b2. > ========================== %< ================================ > > xml-apis-2.0.2 is simply a "wrong" release and we should refer the correct > one. > > Cheers, > Jörg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org