commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <>
Subject Re: Home for the colt fork
Date Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:33:53 GMT
I wouldn't like to see a dependency on mahout code in a "commons"
library.  That seems kind of backwards.  If Mahout wants to offload
this stuff, we can move it into a library in commons (which is
typically how stuff used to happen in Jakarta).

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Benson Margulies <> wrote:
> Mahout now has a fork of a portion of the 'category A' portion of the
> CERN colt library forked. The Mahout fork is, of course, in the Mahout
> tree under a Mahout Java package and Maven triple.
> I want to use the collections classes from Mahout as the core to a new
> set of commons-primitives classes that do the useful things that GNU
> Trove does.
> The classes I want to start from depend on the classes that are in the
> Mahout fork.
> As a temporary expedient, I can depend on their there. However, I
> submit that it would be more better if the mathematical code were in
> commons-math. Was this option explored?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message