commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rahul Akolkar <>
Subject Sandbox karma request (was Re: primitives)
Date Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:07:24 GMT
Pretty sure it will when psteitz sees it, but changing subject here
for better visibility.

Sandbox karma requested by bimargulies.


On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Benson Margulies <> wrote:
> Did my email register as a request for sandbox karma?
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Henri Yandell <> wrote:
>> Or you could start up a sandbox project. We've had good success with
>> ASF committers creating a sandbox branch of a released component, and
>> after diving in for a while it's then merged in to trunk where they
>> then become one of the most active coders of that component.
>> So +1 to a sandbox branch to primitives if you have ideas you'd like
>> to play with. ASF committers get karma to the sandbox on request, so
>> just need you to want to do that and we can add karma.
>> Hen
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Benson Margulies <> wrote:
>>> Stephen,
>>> It's interesting to me that the world in general knows about Trove,
>>> but not so much this.
>>> The fact that the front page is labelled with a snapshot version might
>>> have something to do with it, but I am kind of mystified. One thing
>>> that I'd like to add that Trove has is a full generic object hash map
>>> that is an open hash to avoid the space bloat of the stock Java
>>> HashMap.
>>> I am willing to make time to work on this. Since I'm not a committer
>>> at commons, I'm thinking that my proposed lab is a reasonable place to
>>> put in some effort and then bring it back into commons. Or maybe I
>>> should just start teeing up patches at commons? I find that
>>> reorganizing changes that might be called for to do generics and such
>>> are really clumsy  in patches, so svn cp-ing to a lab might still make
>>> sense.
>>> I'm copy the labs list to test if I'm making a particle of sense.
>>> --benson
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Stephen Colebourne
>>> <> wrote:
>>>> Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>> I proposed a lab over at labs in which to start construction of
>>>>> something much like what commons-primitives describes itself as
>>>>> setting out to do. The web page for primitives suggests a rather
>>>>> dormant state. Is there anybody in there actively working on
>>>>> primitives?
>>>> I think [primitives] is stable and complete, thus appears rather quiet.
>>>> I'd also point out Joda-Primitives -
>>>> Its a fork of the concept of [primitives] but with an API design I felt more
>>>> comfortable with. However, I don't have time to work on it (generify,
>>>> release). I'll grant access to anyone that wants to help on it.
>>>> Stephen

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message