Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98934 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2009 08:14:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Nov 2009 08:14:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 60843 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2009 08:14:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 60696 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2009 08:14:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 60686 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2009 08:14:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:14:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jak-commons-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.12] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:14:03 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NDZTy-0007UJ-43 for dev@commons.apache.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:13:42 +0100 Received: from mail.elsag-solutions.com ([62.154.225.82]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:13:42 +0100 Received: from joerg.schaible by mail.elsag-solutions.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:13:42 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@commons.apache.org From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmc=?= Schaible Subject: Re: [dbcp] 1.3 release packaging - take two Followup-To: gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:13:12 +0100 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <4B0DA868.2090801@gmail.com> <4B0DAC2C.7090709@gmail.com> <55afdc850911251525j206c6911j25edb72055d04da5@mail.gmail.com> <4B0DBE51.8010500@gmail.com> <55afdc850911251539h6f9a091ap34d655bc6c6d010b@mail.gmail.com> <55afdc850911251548o23614c09l31621fb725d5ae72@mail.gmail.com> <4B0DC694.9040803@gmail.com> <55afdc850911251651y2adff6ffu86c2f66ff7c200de@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mail.elsag-solutions.com User-Agent: KNode/4.3.1 Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Paul, Paul Benedict wrote at Donnerstag, 26. November 2009 05:03: > When I was patching Hibernate, they needed different sources because > of JDBC3/4 incompatibility. It just wasn't possible to compile for > both dependencies. > > I just checked with Brett Porter of Maven. He says that if the sources > are identical, you can use qualifiers; otherwise it would conflict > when you generate sources/javadocs/tests. You couldn't publish > different sources/etc. once the qualifier is used -- makes sense you > can't append more than one qualifier. > > Based on this advice, I revert to my previous advice and say they > should be separate artifactIds with no qualifiers. OK, but then we should really think about "drop-in replacement" or not. Basically we say that dbcp 1.3 with JDBC4 will not be backward compatible. Then why don't we use the new artifactId for this and allow 1.3 with JDBC3 to be a real drop-in replacement? If somebody works with ranges, he might get the newer dbcp anyway and wondering about the incompatibility later. Therefore we might better do: org.apache.commons:commons-dbcp4:1.3 commons-dbcp:commons-dbcp:1.3 - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org