commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jörg Schaible <>
Subject Re: [dbcp] 1.3 release packaging - take two
Date Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:38:31 GMT
Phil Steitz wrote at Donnerstag, 26. November 2009 17:39:

> Did you miss that I cut out the "commons" from the artifactId?

Yes, I missed it :D

> That way we have commons-dbcp-1.3.jar and dbcp-1.3.jar in the wild.
>  I guess I liked "dbcp" better than "commons-dbcp4" for the new
> artifactId.  IIUC, the only reason we have kept the "commons-" on
> the relocated commons artifactIds for components moved thus far is
> so the relocation poms will work.   Since we are not doing that
> here, we can make a clean break and use what seems to me at least a
> more natural artifactId.  As always, could be I am missing something.

No, you're totally right, "dbcp" and "commons-dbcp4" are equal from the 
technical point of view. However, I feel a bit like Niall here dropping 
"commons-" as prefix. But that's just me, we're both simply pressed by the 
necessity to have a different name.

- Jörg

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message