commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niall Pemberton <>
Subject Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303
Date Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:40:17 GMT
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Kevan Miller <> wrote:
> Apologies for chiming in late.
> From a Geronimo/EE 6 perspective, I'm definitely interested in seeing a 303 implementation
at Apache. I'm not likely to have much time for implementation. However, if champions or mentors
are needed, I'd be willing to help.

Great - I added you to the proposal - thanks


> On Nov 4, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> <snip>
>>> Its the normal route to have separate lists @incubator - but I don't
>>> see why it has to go that way. If Commons is the intended destination
>>> then it will make acceptance by Commons smoother since they will see
>>> the activity during incubation. Anyway, I'm not wedded to this idea
>>> but I would like to start with that basis - if there is a negative
>>> reaction either here or if/when it goes to general@incubator then we
>>> can revert to the usual model. Is your objection because you don't
>>> like it or because you don't think it would be allowed?
>> No objection.  I just hadn't seen any other Podlings do it this way... It's worth
a try.
> Subversion is going to be using non-incubator mailing lists. So, there is some precedent.
No harm in trying, IMO...
> --kevan
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message