commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mikkel Meyer Andersen <>
Subject Re: [math] Generate random data using the Inverse CDF Method?
Date Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:09:13 GMT
I understand your opinion, but I don't agree with you (but I accept
that you have a different meaning about things just as I expect you to
accept mine). I'm sure this is quite common in projects like this, and
are interesting in hearing how matters like this are settled? Are
there any committers besides you - and how many? And do you guys they
have some sort of private list where you discuss this or is it totally
up to you to decide how this ends (maybe waiting for others on the
list to have their saying)? I don't mean to be rude or impolite, so
excuse me if I am; I just don't know how this stuff works.

Cheers, Mikkel.

2009/10/31 Ted Dunning <>:
> Is that a completely unchangeable opinion?
> Would you be willing to live with data generation in the distribution
> classes even if you don't particularly like it?
> Would user opinions sway your opinion if we had some way of collecting them?
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Phil Steitz <> wrote:
>> > What do you think about the proposal at
>> > in regards to our
>> > discussion on the topic?
>> As I said above, I am not in favor of adding random data generation
>> to the distributions package.
> --
> Ted Dunning, CTO
> DeepDyve

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message