From dev-return-116416-apmail-commons-dev-archive=commons.apache.org@commons.apache.org Fri Oct 09 20:38:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50739 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2009 20:38:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2009 20:38:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 26559 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 20:38:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 26434 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 20:38:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 26424 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2009 20:38:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:38:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jak-commons-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.12] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:38:28 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MwMDu-0008SL-Nq for dev@commons.apache.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:37:58 +0200 Received: from hsi-kbw-078-043-048-083.hsi4.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([78.43.48.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:37:58 +0200 Received: from joerg.schaible by hsi-kbw-078-043-048-083.hsi4.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:37:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: dev@commons.apache.org To: dev@commons.apache.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg?= Schaible Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1 Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:37:32 +0200 Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: <55afdc850910080731v20ac9a93i77413ccf473d7197@mail.gmail.com> <55afdc850910081503y7aef6abn80fb93e723b7cffe@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: joerg.schaible@gmx.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hsi-kbw-078-043-048-083.hsi4.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Niall, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote at Freitag, 9. Oktober 2009 00:03: > >> Hi Jörg, >> >> Thanks for testing, comments inline... >> > > [snip] > >>> >>> Issues with Sun JDK 1.3.1: >>> ========================== >>> >>> Source compilable, but a lot of tests fail. >> >> All the tests pass for me - I was using Ant 1.7.1 and Sun's JDK >> 1.3.1_18 on Windows XP - but I tried Ant 1.6.5 and JDK 1.3.1_20 (again >> on WinXP) and also had no problems. Are the tests actually failing or >> are you just seeing alot of exceptions in the output? Because >> BeanUtils uses reflection to intialise the "cause" when re-throwing >> exceptions for JDK 1.4+, but for JDK 1.3 it logs the stack trace of >> the original exception. For example: >> >> > http://commons.apache.org/beanutils/xref/org/apache/commons/beanutils/PropertyUtilsBean.html#2194 >> > http://commons.apache.org/beanutils/xref/org/apache/commons/beanutils/BeanUtilsBean.html#1041 > > > I'll have a closer look this evening when I'm back from office, but, yes, > it looks like a lot of those. Yes, I can confirm that the unit tests itself do not report any error or failure, the output seems to be what I can expect from your links above. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org