commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303
Date Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:56:28 GMT
Hi Niall,
thanks for your reply, that's my

+1

:) I'm not an Apache Committer but I already contributed to Cocoon3
and just submitted my first patch to commons-digester, so I'm quite
familiar to how things work here.

Sure, I'll follow the list and take me in consideration!!
All the best,
Simone

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
<nour.mohammad@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Actually this is even better to start from scratch. I am in Niall.
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Niall Pemberton
> <niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Simone Tripodi
>> <simone.tripodi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>> I don't have the rights to express votes but at least please let me
>>
>> Anyone can vote - it may end up we don't agree - but votes are appreciated.
>>
>>> say that sounds great, commons-validation has to be the proper home
>>> for JSR303, I'd like to contribute in this project since I already
>>> started studying the spec :)
>>
>> Great - I'm assuming you're not an existing ASF committer, so it'll
>> have to be patches via JIRA tickets:
>>
>> http://commons.apache.org/validator/issue-tracking.html
>>
>> Probably best to ping the list before starting work so that we don't
>> end up duplicating effort.
>>
>> Niall
>>
>>> All the best,
>>> Simone
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> +!
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Niall Pemberton
>>>>> <niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The current trunk in the validator2 sandbox is a copy of the Validator
>>>>>> 1.4 code from "commons proper" - but I think we should dump all the
>>>>>> existing validator framework code and just retain the "routines"
>>>>>> package. Trying to maintain any sort of compatibility with the
>>>>>> existing validator framework would be alot more work and code and
>>>>>> create a real mess IMO and I think it would be better to not to even
>>>>>> try. The "routines" package was refactored realtively recently(!)
and
>>>>>> can stand on its own.
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.google.com/profiles/simone.tripodi
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> - Mohammad Nour
> - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour
> ----
> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
> - Albert Einstein
>
> "Writing clean code is what you must do in order to call yourself a
> professional. There is no reasonable excuse for doing anything less
> than your best."
> - Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>



-- 
http://www.google.com/profiles/simone.tripodi

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message