Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >>> Artefacts look good, tests OK on JDK 1.5 and 1.6. >>> >>> Was just wondering about the signed m2 artifacts? >>> >>> >> Those will be identical to the jars in the binary distribution. I can >> upload an image of the m2 repo directory including sigs, hashes, jars, pom >> for inspection; but I view the tars/zips as what we are releasing - in fact >> really just the src. >> >> > > > You're correct that the source is the key component ofcourse. I'm more > comfortable seeing m2 artifacts staged both as an RM and as someone > looking at RCs to vote on (since I suspect a sizeable percentage of > folks get our libraries out of m2 central and its mirrors these days). > > I haven't looked at the artifacts yet. > I put the signed m2 artifacts in a subdirectory here: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC4/maven/ Phil > -Rahul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org