commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC3
Date Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:24:06 GMT
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Julius Davies<juliusdavies@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Codec developers,
>
>
> I dropped commons-codec-1.4.jar into IntelliJ 7.0 (my current editor)
> to see how the auto-completion looks.  Now I'm having second thoughts
> on two method names for CODEC-59.  Here's what it currently looks
> like:
>
> Base64.encodeBase64String(byte[] binaryData)
> Base64.encodeBase64URLSafeString(byte[] binaryData)
>
> http://juliusdavies.ca/codec/base64String.png
> (screenshot from IntelliJ 7, 15KB, 760x187)
>
>
> I'm wondering if the word "To" should be inserted there?  As in "ToString":
>
> Base64.encodeBase64ToString(byte[] binaryData)
> Base64.encodeBase64URLSafeToString(byte[] binaryData)
>
> http://juliusdavies.ca/codec/base64ToString.png
> (screenshot from IntelliJ 7, 14KB, 736x162)
>
>
> Sorry about this inane niggling.  I just thought it's either now or
> never!

Yes, once the API's released then its not going to change, so if the
Codec devs want to do this, then we need to do it now and roll another
RC. Anyone got a strong opinion on this?

Niall

>  Any one else have opinions about this extremely minor cosmetic
> point?  (Good bikeshedding candidate, but still... somehow
> aesthetically bothersome?)
>
>
> yours,
>
> Julius
>
>
> ps. Niall, I downloaded all the artifacts from
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/ and they look great.
> Ant and Maven builds working great from all *-src artifacts.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Niall
> Pemberton<niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Niall
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Niall
>> Pemberton<niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I have prepared a third release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the
>>> feedback from the first.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC3
>>> [ ] -1 No, because...
>>>
>>> The tag for RC3 is here:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/codec/tags/CODEC_1_4_RC3/
>>>
>>> The release artefacts are here
>>> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/
>>>
>>> Site is available here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/
>>> (note: some links are relative and will be broken until deployed to
>>> proper codec home)
>>>
>>> RAT Report:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/rat-report.html
>>>
>>> CLIRR Report:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/clirr-report.html
>>>
>>> Release Notes:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/changes-report.html
>>> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Niall
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> yours,
>
> Julius Davies
> 250-592-2284 (Home)
> 250-893-4579 (Mobile)
> http://juliusdavies.ca/logging.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message