Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A38DA0C.8060601@gmail.com>
References: <bbfd0f3e0906161942o4bd2b39bjb691d85f21ef463@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A38DA0C.8060601@gmail.com>
From: Alexander Chmyr <achmyr@cogniance.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:35:29 +0300
Message-ID: <a21234980906171435h515b3417mcbcd1409741fe530@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [pool] Re: Apache Common Pool Road Map
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502d30826b563046c9213bc

--00504502d30826b563046c9213bc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello Phil,
Maybe it make sence to freeze 1.x and do only bugfixing there. AFAIK new
development based on JDKs later than 1.5, hense production environment for
existing do not going to be updated to 1.5 and older

Alexander Chmyr
Software Engineer
Cogniance, Inc
--------------------------
http://cloudmade.com


On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dheeraj Kumar wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Congratulations on Pool 1.5.1 release.
>>  I was looking for Java 1.5 generics support on Apache Commons Pool and
>> found out RoadMap at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/PoolRoadMap(last edited 2006-09-10 02:28:23 by SandyMcArthur). Other than that, bug
>> related to this at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-83. I felt,
>> it is good time to have another check on this RoadMap and combine release
>> track for Pool  2.0 and Pool 3.0. As it will reduce lots of
>> development/maintainance efforts. Anyone using JDK below 1.5, will be happy
>> with 1.x track, and for JDK 1.5+ user, there will be Pool 2.x.
>>
> Thanks for the feedback.  The roadmap Wiki page definitely needs to be
> updated.  I will do that following discussion here.  I agree with combining
> the 2.0 and 3.0 tracks, but we need to agree first on what, if any, behavior
> changes we implement as part of the next major release.  I would also like
> us to continue supporting the 1.x branch for backward compatibility and
> pre-JDK 1.5 environments.
>
> At this point, other than addressing POOL-131,  I am not yet convinced that
> we should implement any behavior changes beyond those that were implemented
> in pool 1.4.   That is, of course, just my opinion and I am open to
> suggestions on contract changes for 2.0.  Does anyone have specific
> suggestions for API improvement or comments on the Wiki page?
>
> Phil
>
>>
>>
>> Best Wishes.
>> Dheeraj Kumar Sidana,
>> Senior Software Engineer,
>> Webaroo India Pvt. Ltd,
>> Delhi, India
>> http://www.dksidana.com/
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

--00504502d30826b563046c9213bc--