commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dheeraj Kumar <dksid...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [pool] Re: Apache Common Pool Road Map
Date Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:34:58 GMT
I agree for most of written under 2.x track on
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/PoolRoadMap. except, returnObject
should throw an exception whenever required.

I wrote expected sample interface at
http://code.google.com/p/jnaturals/source/browse/trunk/Pool/src/com/dksidana/java/pool/

-Regards,
Dheeraj Kumar Sidana,
Senior Software Engineer,
Webaroo India Pvt. Ltd,
Delhi, India
http://www.dksidana.com/
Rodney Dangerfield<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/r/rodney_dangerfield.html>
- "What a dog I got, his favorite bone is in my arm."

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dheeraj Kumar wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Congratulations on Pool 1.5.1 release.
>>  I was looking for Java 1.5 generics support on Apache Commons Pool and
>> found out RoadMap at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/PoolRoadMap(last edited
2006-09-10 02:28:23 by SandyMcArthur). Other than that, bug
>> related to this at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-83. I felt,
>> it is good time to have another check on this RoadMap and combine release
>> track for Pool  2.0 and Pool 3.0. As it will reduce lots of
>> development/maintainance efforts. Anyone using JDK below 1.5, will be happy
>> with 1.x track, and for JDK 1.5+ user, there will be Pool 2.x.
>>
> Thanks for the feedback.  The roadmap Wiki page definitely needs to be
> updated.  I will do that following discussion here.  I agree with combining
> the 2.0 and 3.0 tracks, but we need to agree first on what, if any, behavior
> changes we implement as part of the next major release.  I would also like
> us to continue supporting the 1.x branch for backward compatibility and
> pre-JDK 1.5 environments.
>
> At this point, other than addressing POOL-131,  I am not yet convinced that
> we should implement any behavior changes beyond those that were implemented
> in pool 1.4.   That is, of course, just my opinion and I am open to
> suggestions on contract changes for 2.0.  Does anyone have specific
> suggestions for API improvement or comments on the Wiki page?
>
> Phil
>
>>
>>
>> Best Wishes.
>> Dheeraj Kumar Sidana,
>> Senior Software Engineer,
>> Webaroo India Pvt. Ltd,
>> Delhi, India
>> http://www.dksidana.com/
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message