commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [pool] Re: Apache Common Pool Road Map
Date Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:47:46 GMT
Alexander Chmyr wrote:
> Hello Phil,
> Maybe it make sence to freeze 1.x and do only bugfixing there. AFAIK new
> development based on JDKs later than 1.5, hense production environment for
> existing do not going to be updated to 1.5 and older
>   
Yes.  This is what I meant.  Maintain 1.x with no interface changes - 
only bugfixes.

Phil
> Alexander Chmyr
> Software Engineer
> Cogniance, Inc
> --------------------------
> http://cloudmade.com
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Dheeraj Kumar wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Congratulations on Pool 1.5.1 release.
>>>  I was looking for Java 1.5 generics support on Apache Commons Pool and
>>> found out RoadMap at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/PoolRoadMap(last
edited 2006-09-10 02:28:23 by SandyMcArthur). Other than that, bug
>>> related to this at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-83. I felt,
>>> it is good time to have another check on this RoadMap and combine release
>>> track for Pool  2.0 and Pool 3.0. As it will reduce lots of
>>> development/maintainance efforts. Anyone using JDK below 1.5, will be happy
>>> with 1.x track, and for JDK 1.5+ user, there will be Pool 2.x.
>>>
>>>       
>> Thanks for the feedback.  The roadmap Wiki page definitely needs to be
>> updated.  I will do that following discussion here.  I agree with combining
>> the 2.0 and 3.0 tracks, but we need to agree first on what, if any, behavior
>> changes we implement as part of the next major release.  I would also like
>> us to continue supporting the 1.x branch for backward compatibility and
>> pre-JDK 1.5 environments.
>>
>> At this point, other than addressing POOL-131,  I am not yet convinced that
>> we should implement any behavior changes beyond those that were implemented
>> in pool 1.4.   That is, of course, just my opinion and I am open to
>> suggestions on contract changes for 2.0.  Does anyone have specific
>> suggestions for API improvement or comments on the Wiki page?
>>
>> Phil
>>
>>     
>>> Best Wishes.
>>> Dheeraj Kumar Sidana,
>>> Senior Software Engineer,
>>> Webaroo India Pvt. Ltd,
>>> Delhi, India
>>> http://www.dksidana.com/
>>>
>>>       
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>>     
>
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message