commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [all] Source jars for released components
Date Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:30:04 GMT
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Phil Steitz a écrit :
>   
>> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>     
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>  
>>>       
>>>> POOL-141 is asking for source jars for old versions of [pool] to be
>>>> pushed
>>>> to maven central.  I think we talked about this before in relation to
>>>> another component, but I can't find the thread and can't recall the
>>>> resolution.
>>>>
>>>> Have we done this before?  If so, did we use the source distro or the
>>>> tag to
>>>> build the jar and how exactly did we do it (left to my own devices I
>>>> would
>>>> add an m2 pom to the sources and just use the source plugin)?  Do we
>>>> need to
>>>> VOTE?
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> <snip/>
>>>
>>> Can't find the thread either (haven't looked too hard) but ISTR the
>>> upload without a vote, presumably from the source distro.
>>>   
>>>       
>> I created source jars for pool 1.1-1.4 from the release source
>> distributions by adding m2 poms and using the source plugin.  Anyone
>> have any objections to my pushing them to the rsynch m2 repo?
>>
>> The signed source jars are here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-source-jars/
>>
>> I would appreciate it if someone could validate the sigs and inspect the
>> jars.  Thanks!
>>     
>
> I checked the gpg signature, MD5 sums and SHA1 sums for the four jars
> (1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4). They were good.
>
> For the jars content, I manually checked out the corresponding versions
> from subversion with svn co
> https://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_[1,
> 2, 3, 4]. And then compared the files in the jars with the files from
> subversion. The only differences were cvs/svn keywords expansions in the
> files headers and eol markers (I checked on a Linux box). The jars files
> contained only the files from the src/java part in the subversion
> repository and some additional files in the META-INF directory. This
> looks good as long as we don't expect these files to contain also the
> build scripts.
>   
Thanks, Luc!

The "source jars" are just for IDE integration (IIUC), so do not need to 
contain test files or build scripts.  They are by no means an 
alternative to the source distros.  Thanks again for checking.

Phil
> Luc
>
>   
>> Phil
>>     
>>> In this case, since 1.5 isn't too far and will have the source jar,
>>> another option to consider may be to WONTFIX that issue (and point to
>>> 1.5 when ready).
>>>
>>> -Rahul
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>       
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Phil
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message