commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luc Maisonobe <>
Subject Re: [all] Source jars for released components
Date Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:23:46 GMT
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Phil Steitz <>
>> wrote:
>>> POOL-141 is asking for source jars for old versions of [pool] to be
>>> pushed
>>> to maven central.  I think we talked about this before in relation to
>>> another component, but I can't find the thread and can't recall the
>>> resolution.
>>> Have we done this before?  If so, did we use the source distro or the
>>> tag to
>>> build the jar and how exactly did we do it (left to my own devices I
>>> would
>>> add an m2 pom to the sources and just use the source plugin)?  Do we
>>> need to
>>> VOTE?
>> <snip/>
>> Can't find the thread either (haven't looked too hard) but ISTR the
>> upload without a vote, presumably from the source distro.
> I created source jars for pool 1.1-1.4 from the release source
> distributions by adding m2 poms and using the source plugin.  Anyone
> have any objections to my pushing them to the rsynch m2 repo?
> The signed source jars are here:
> I would appreciate it if someone could validate the sigs and inspect the
> jars.  Thanks!

I checked the gpg signature, MD5 sums and SHA1 sums for the four jars
(1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4). They were good.

For the jars content, I manually checked out the corresponding versions
from subversion with svn co[1,
2, 3, 4]. And then compared the files in the jars with the files from
subversion. The only differences were cvs/svn keywords expansions in the
files headers and eol markers (I checked on a Linux box). The jars files
contained only the files from the src/java part in the subversion
repository and some additional files in the META-INF directory. This
looks good as long as we don't expect these files to contain also the
build scripts.


> Phil
>> In this case, since 1.5 isn't too far and will have the source jar,
>> another option to consider may be to WONTFIX that issue (and point to
>> 1.5 when ready).
>> -Rahul
>>> Thanks!
>>> Phil
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message