commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Barker" <billwbar...@verizon.net>
Subject Re: [math] reviewing the current state on serialization
Date Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:14:38 GMT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Luc Maisonobe" <Luc.Maisonobe@free.fr>
To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:14 PM
Subject: [math] reviewing the current state on serialization


> Hello,
>
> I have reviewed the current state of serialization within [math]. It's
> much simpler than before, thanks to Bill's work. I have removed almost
> everything serializable in ODE as this didn't make sense anymore, except
> for the step interpolators.
>
> Now I'm wondering if we should push this a little further, for example
> by removing serializable for some abstract classes like
> ConvergingAlgorithmImpl, UnivariateRealSolverImpl,
> UnivariateRealIntegratorImpl ... and also for the concrete classes that
> are pure transient processing algorithms (solvers, integrators ...).
>
> What do you think ?
>

+1
The only reason I left those abstract classes was that I couldn't find a 
no-arg constructor for them that made sense.  And I left the transient 
processing ones only so as to avoid noise on the list for going over them 
package by package.
> Luc
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message