Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19257 invoked from network); 7 May 2009 05:07:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 May 2009 05:07:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 89562 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2009 05:07:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 89463 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2009 05:07:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 89453 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2009 05:07:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 May 2009 05:07:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of grobmeier@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.161 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.161] (HELO mail-bw0-f161.google.com) (209.85.218.161) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 May 2009 05:07:05 +0000 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so567128bwz.42 for ; Wed, 06 May 2009 22:06:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BUu3ZvuqVUprOlHjdNB6X1tDQV1o7exkBtV9KQne0lc=; b=vAzMM2r0l9r4TtR+9JHirbMPZa/otBo/+ax94vf0SLkN+zyJUyzB9kNufw2hZaaspT I+tWVmJjFfpKi7BrtBki3Ifm+l/zRTmcINYOxPlftczPs4CdMYYzP+5Cq17mZcQH/JDR A4IQ8Blz00tyAJnDRyzD3RDyVt05AO93YE+88= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=soXwHrqE2ppwngrLjhLwwj3ifNyLgyoydu/pu1M3O1aPZFiyEhBoVO/gAIjrmeqGU3 2/olpW6Xs+oqwuVIcC5g5JVz06bZh3t1YHBRK8EtP1MeX45+XP5ndTbaCPmkxVSeDdaO keuZyqGCICGYK8GVFpYYyC+b5gdLuHWo8OzRQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.127.8 with SMTP id e8mr848726fas.95.1241672805103; Wed, 06 May 2009 22:06:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4A007298.9050104@it20one.at> <25aac9fc0905051420n55a2c0fdo1740b45e26266279@mail.gmail.com> <91548FF2-C7CF-4F06-A8A8-523B21DF333D@SUN.com> <3FCA4A4F-57A9-446A-A145-FA4B0D44646D@SUN.com> From: Christian Grobmeier Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:06:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [releasing] PGP keys for code signing To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >> I'd vote for this signature being valid to sign releases. Only incubator >> releases right now, since it hasn't been signed by the Apache WOT. That can >> be fixed at a Sign-a-Thon. ;-) >> > I'd vote for Apache Commons releases signed by any key thats in the > KEYS file (regardless of WOT status -- keysigning would be good and is > encouraged, but isn't a blocker). I would be glad about that --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org