Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 831 invoked from network); 30 May 2009 20:57:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 May 2009 20:57:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 97272 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2009 20:57:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 97157 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2009 20:57:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 97147 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2009 20:57:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 May 2009 20:57:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.27.42.3] (HELO smtp3-g21.free.fr) (212.27.42.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 May 2009 20:57:43 +0000 Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6199A818109 for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 22:57:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (mar75-7-82-247-19-29.fbx.proxad.net [82.247.19.29]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405A98180BC for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 22:57:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A219DAD.9060409@apache.org> Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 22:57:17 +0200 From: Emmanuel Bourg User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [all] Testing interface implementations References: <4A211BF1.5030600@apache.org> <4A213686.4050208@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A213686.4050208@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Phil Steitz a �crit : > You have probably thought of this and it may be distasteful, but one way > to break things apart would be to break the single abstract test class > into an artificial hierarchy. If there is a way to do this with some > kind of semantic integrity (e.g., if it can be made to coincide with the > "known to fail" relation) that could be a simple solution. Yes that's probably the only solution. Thank you for the input. Emmanuel Bourg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org