Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81092 invoked from network); 23 May 2009 15:00:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 May 2009 15:00:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 33552 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2009 15:00:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 33427 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2009 15:00:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 33417 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2009 15:00:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 May 2009 15:00:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of phil.steitz@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.125 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.125] (HELO mail-qy0-f125.google.com) (209.85.221.125) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 May 2009 15:00:18 +0000 Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so619024qyk.10 for ; Sat, 23 May 2009 07:59:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W1Ksf70hk4A6sSN0YpYIufRaNPGJn/Gpinbe0tySMpw=; b=FdhxoYzp2E7KKnSGuPxkjmJmcYv7+P9OB1CSkKs48THrRe0X4UPGNUEjrZ/HiIxHjf 4hBET2dql4ocjO7EfuukmlN2s6ypc4eR/BNcRHCQvKl3+AFAXWfkL4Om0stKT8p1T09k 66AWZnDbI7Nua2j0bloRy5jpkS/s9brXyOwA4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BhzvUC3zJBAD/MCrvjnYSPMeWMTbd4+HYiO0JbtUtEx0L6Okml8rPEVhgnaD+DKiF3 B6PoeMrUZF9BwtHlggtRY1EHw7V96xC56y/5CzGev0zMG0obrwAqTDTQGg/HncWv1Eyd Wtn+HfY5xp4H3gn69AlIl4TONQ5dLJg/EWPPU= Received: by 10.224.28.142 with SMTP id m14mr5048362qac.80.1243090797371; Sat, 23 May 2009 07:59:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phil-steitzs-macbook-pro.local (pool-98-114-117-73.phlapa.east.verizon.net [98.114.117.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm1738858qwf.35.2009.05.23.07.59.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 23 May 2009 07:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A180F6A.708@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 10:59:54 -0400 From: Phil Steitz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [math] Apache Math TLP? [WAS Re: [math] top-level package name] References: <1031284269.302561242730434393.JavaMail.root@spooler6-g27.priv.proxad.net> <4A17ED68.7080504@blueyonder.co.uk> <4A180415.8090502@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <4A180415.8090502@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Rahul Akolkar a �crit : > >> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin >> wrote: >> >>> (apologies for jumping in half way through) >>> >>> luc.maisonobe@free.fr wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Considering the ongoing discussion in another thread, the current changes that have been done on >>>> [math] for the last months belong to the major changes with large incompatibilities with previous versions. >>>> We have already decided that the version number will be 2.0 to acknowledge that. I know of at least one big >>>> international research project that uses commons-math 1.2 and will switch to 2.0 when it will be published. >>>> They have already faced compatibility problems recently (two days ago). >>>> >>>> Should we change the top level package name from org.apache.commons.math to org.apache.commons.math2 ? >>>> >>> why not org.apache.math ;-) >>> >>> maybe the time and interest levels are now right to consider a TLP... >>> >>> >> >> >> I'd support such a resolution if and when the [math] developers deem it fit. >> > > This is tempting ... > > The pros: > There is currently some momentum in [math] and several people seem > interested. There are also several other mathematical projects floating > around and apparently ready to cooperate. The component is becoming > quite large by now and its focus slightly shifts away from the rest of > the commons components. > > The cons: > Maybe the current interest will vanish once 2.0 is out. A top level > project is probably more administrative work than simply resting in the > comfort of the commons. > > What do other people think ? > Until they kick us out, I say stay here ;) Somewhat more seriously, I like staying in commons for three reasons 1) We get good advice, help on administrivia, and committed committers showing up now and then. This is the core benefit that all commons components share. 2) While we are getting some nice "long tail" contributions in the runup to 2.0, I don't think we have critical "committed committer" mass to maintain a TLP right now. 3) Diffusion and umbrella-ism is a big risk if we go TLP. While we have grown a substantial codebase here, it is still manageable as a single maven project, delivering a single, self-contained 100% Java jar. I would like to hold onto that. I guess it is possible for that to be a subproject of a broader umbrella, but I am not personally energized by the umbrella idea and I would rather live in a place that is very good at managing java components than a new umbrella. Of course, this is all your fault, Robert (he he) (For those not around at the time, Robert created the monster that is now [math]....) Phil > Luc > > >> -Rahul >> >> >> >>> - robert >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org