commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <>
Subject Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [math] top-level package name
Date Sat, 23 May 2009 15:24:02 GMT
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Phil Steitz <> wrote:
> Of course, our way here is to come to agreement and it looks like we have
> not done that in this case.  My original vote (+1) was partly for
> consistency with the rest of commons and out of fear of "jar hell"
> scenarios.  I was swayed by Niall's argument and reflection on use cases
> that I am aware of.  I am sure Niall as well is open to enlightenment if
> others can point to practical use cases (observed or likely) involving
> [math] that demonstrate that the "pain-minimizing" alternative is to change
> the package name.

Didn't someone say that math already had a "jar hell" situation
encountered by users?

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message