commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: [all] Rebooting commons projects
Date Wed, 13 May 2009 02:30:19 GMT
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Dan Fabulich <dan@fabulich.com> wrote:
> If you feel like you'd want to call it "lang2" or "lang-ng" then just call
> it lang 2.0 or 3.0 or whatever and keep a lang-1.x branch around for
> stability fixes.

I thought we agreed that we would "jump" major version numbers (as you
suggest here I think) whenever we are going to break backwards
compatibility (which would include "next generation" type changes).
Then, we would change the package name to match to avoid the "jar
hell" issue.

I don't like the "ng" stuff either.  What's next?  Commons Lang Deep
Space 9?  :)  Doesn't a new major version number imply "next
generation"?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message