That's a very good idea IMO.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> (apologies for jumping in half way through)
>
> luc.maisonobe@free.fr wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Considering the ongoing discussion in another thread, the current changes that have
been done on
>> [math] for the last months belong to the major changes with large incompatibilities
with previous versions.
>> We have already decided that the version number will be 2.0 to acknowledge that.
I know of at least one big
>> international research project that uses commons-math 1.2 and will switch to 2.0
when it will be published.
>> They have already faced compatibility problems recently (two days ago).
>>
>> Should we change the top level package name from org.apache.commons.math to org.apache.commons.math2
?
>
> why not org.apache.math ;-)
>
> maybe the time and interest levels are now right to consider a TLP...
>
> - robert
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp.
edwardyoon@apache.org
http://blog.udanax.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
|