commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <>
Subject Re: [math] Re: commons-math, matrix-toolkits-java and consolidation
Date Tue, 19 May 2009 18:17:29 GMT
The output of f2j is almost unusable for normal mortals.  There will
definitely be a wrapper layer.

Also, there is more than a wrapper in MTJ.  There are also higher order
algorithms that use the lower level linear algebra provided by f2j.

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Jin Mingjian <> wrote:

> Can I ask a question? how about MTJ vs pure F2J? (If I don't use the native
> part of MTJ.)
> Can I get more must-have things? is it necessary to introduce a wrapper
> layer?
> Best regards,
> Jin

Ted Dunning, CTO

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message