commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY
Date Mon, 18 May 2009 17:36:18 GMT
Thanks, Matt and Ceki. It's all clear now.

Craig

On May 18, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:

> Craig L Russell wrote:
>> Just for my information, why is it not desirable to package this as  
>> an OSGi compliant jar?
>
> Because we would not want an empty bundle containing no classes to
> usurp the place of the real commons-logging OSGi bundle.
>
>> Also, why is the maven group id commons-logging and not  
>> org.apache.commons? Is this just a historical curiosity or was  
>> there a purpose?
>
> The artifact we want substitute for has the groupId
> "commons-logging". Version 0.0-EMPTY has to have the exact same
> groupId, otherwise it would not be a Maven dependency substitute.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Craig
> -- 
> Ceki Gülcü
> Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework  
> for Java.
> http://logback.qos.ch
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>

Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message