-1
IMO breaking compatibility should be decided on a case-by-case basis
for components. For the widely used variety such as lang, logging,
collections etc then I agree lets avoid jar-hell and not do it. But
for other components that are not so widely used then such as Math I
think its better to minimize the pain of upgrading for the user.
Niall
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Luc Maisonobe <Luc.Maisonobe@free.fr> wrote:
>
> So let's vote on this proposal: change the top level package name on
> [math] from org.apache.commons.math to org.apache.commons.math2.
>
> [] +1 change the top level package name
> [] 0 I don't care
> [] -1 keep the old name
>
> Vote open for 72 hours (up to Friday May 19th 20h00 UTC)
>
> Luc
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
|