commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Phil Steitz <>
Subject Re: [math] Re: commons-math, matrix-toolkits-java and consolidation
Date Sun, 17 May 2009 15:07:48 GMT
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Sam Halliday a écrit :
>> I don't want to hold up a 2.0 release... however it would be a shame to
>> release an API that would restrict further inclusion of MTJ/BLAS, especially
>> in the sparse API. Would it be possible to hold back the linear algebra
>> updates for now?
>> If you'd really like to get 2.0 out as it stands, then can I be involved in
>> an API review to minimise any future problems? This might involve some API
>> changes from today's snapshot (although, no extra features or anything heavy
>> like that).
> Of course you can look at the API and comment on it or suggest changes.
> If they are wise and can be implemented quickly, we'll probably do it.
> If you want some changes to be included, your best bet is to explain
> them on the list and to provide patches for that using JIRA.
++1 - by all means, now is the time to comment on / suggest changes to 
the 2.0 API.

>> I agree... this is far too big a task for 2.0!
>> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> However, as both Phil and I have said, we still want to have 2.0 out
>>> very soon. Adding a complete BLAS API is a huge task so I really prefer
>>> to wait after 2.0. We can discuss about it here, of course. You could
>>> also open a JIRA issue for requesting the enhancement, targeting 2.1.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message