commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY
Date Tue, 19 May 2009 14:47:39 GMT



--- On Tue, 5/19/09, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY
> To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
> Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 9:40 AM
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Ceki
> Gulcu <ceki@qos.ch>
> wrote:
> 
> > Jochen, you do realize that global exclusions would
> suffer from the same
> > problems as you described in the A B C scenario. Here
> is a slightly modified
> > version of your scenario.
> 
> May be, but I'd rather have the overall Maven community
> work on that
> than our isolated group create a special solution for a
> problem, which
> isn't even ours. (Sorry!)

Come to think of it, it occurs to me to wonder what happens if the would-be user of 0.0.0-EMPTY
declares an explicit provided dependency on [logging].  Can anyone say?

-Matt

> 
> Jochen
> 
> 
> -- 
> Don't trust a government that doesn't trust you.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> 
> 


      

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message