commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jochen Wiedmann <>
Subject Re: [sanselan] Next steps
Date Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:35:41 GMT
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Phil Steitz <> wrote:

> 2. Most commons components have a "functional" name instead of a "fun" name.
> Would Sanselan need to be renamed, e.g. Commons Image, or would it be ok to
> have the sub-project called Sanselan, or Commons Sanselan?

What for? It would bring only confusion and additional work. Let's spare that.

> 3. Would any changes be required from the existing packaging of Sanselan?
> For example, packages are named org.apache.sanselan. Would these need to be
> renamed to org.apache.commons.sanselan (or less fun name as above)?

This is the case for most of commons components. No sense in treating
Sanselan otherwise.


Don't trust a government that doesn't trust you.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message