commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Possible incubation?
Date Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:46:15 GMT
On 08/04/2009, gauravarora@codercorp.com <gauravarora@codercorp.com> wrote:
> I think it's more valid to look at Jeha as a framework that only handles
>  what you ask to handle. In the case you describe, if you don't ask Jeha to
>  handle a certain type of exception, then that exception is simply
>  propagated up the stack. I don't think it interferes with the method
>  signature, unless i'm missing something.

That may be so, but it's not mentioned in the Quick Start guide - the
only examples catch Exception, and there is no indication that the
Transformer task can be used to only add handlers for particular
Exceptions.

>  Gaurav
>
>
>  > Hi Andre,
>  >
>  > Andre Dantas Rocha wrote at Dienstag, 7. April 2009 14:38:
>  >
>  >> Hi all,
>  >>
>  >> This message was originally sent to incubator list, but they suggest to
>  >> post it here because *maybe* the idea can fit in Commons project.
>  >>
>  >> I'm developing a framework called Jeha. The main idea is to provide easy
>  >> exception description and handling using annotations in methods and
>  >> classes
>  >> and some commons handlers. I believe that the  idea is simple, but
>  >> powerful.
>  >>
>  >> The initial code and start guide of framework are here:
>  >>
>  > <http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=242203&package_id=294
>  >> 931&release_id=650572>
>  >>
>  > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=242203&package_id=2949
>  >> 31&release_id=650572
>  >>
>  >> I'd like to hear from community if this idea is valuable for a possible
>  >> incubation.
>  >>
>  >> Please let me know your opinion.
>  >
>  > It might be only me, but I see this approach a bit critical. On one hand
>  > you're right, writing exception code is quite tedious sometimes, but with
>  > your solution you wipe out any useful method signature regarding exception
>  > declaration. What happens if I don't wanna handle certain exception types
>  > or RuntimeException instances? I cannot simply rethrow from the handler.
>  >
>  > - Jörg
>  >
>  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message