Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21286 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2009 08:50:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2009 08:50:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 35544 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2009 08:50:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 35481 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2009 08:50:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 35470 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2009 08:50:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:50:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of flamefew@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.237 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.237] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.237) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:50:19 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g9so960220rvb.2 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:49:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v78q3Uh2yIkVRhpqJt4kuNtlU+ZA31VkOVDNBFThGi0=; b=qACZG0gbCLRIcg/3ukC5U5hmj1ipj/VvKZmpKSUkI+j+fZcu04+mHOEmK/DUrp4/yY aHmo9wmg02pVtLHth4/Zl/9cKmEYDflzaTQNGIGe9FuevCRLS3InS3xhs2sh+2ydnlbR JcT0YbI1NMD3Lb7FuJqXefll3voQQDX7OfUH0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=x7gOdeytSnWH7C85JgLlmSSObeUnN/Zw9YzQ/TALYVtJi9y8RD67NPsDnR/mRERy8f HuknZBDuN2dSa8zx6Z5EeEQjR5XXbIMq/JqkQ1/jVBbkrWmlVgfCDFr6JWFYcskayKWc QPZbVJR2cQ2y5jJ+Dah8YCD1YpDOsWvi+PZfc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.84.21 with SMTP id m21mr872019rvl.98.1237020599393; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:49:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <74874.41770.qm@web55105.mail.re4.yahoo.com> References: <74874.41770.qm@web55105.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:49:59 -0700 Message-ID: <31cc37360903140149y6a8276e0o42336f7440284e9b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lang] Developer interested in common-lang project From: Henri Yandell To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yep. My view is that we should charge in, do whatever is the right thing and then when we're ready for release we can worry about back compat and naming and package changing etc. Please, please bring on the 1.5 desires :) I'm also favourable to be 1.6+ if there's any value, I just haven't found much yet. Hen On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > > Hi, Michael. > > =A0[lang] has been officially marked as targeting 1.5 in its m2 pom, so I= suppose you should feel free to let the patches fly. > > Regards, > Matt > > --- On Fri, 3/13/09, Michael Wooten wrote: > >> From: Michael Wooten >> Subject: [lang] Developer interested in common-lang project >> To: dev@commons.apache.org >> Date: Friday, March 13, 2009, 2:22 PM >> Hi. >> I am very interested in contributing to the commons-lang >> project, but would >> like to know the state of it. I've seen several posts in >> JIRA and in the >> developer mailing list about LangTwo and moving to Java 5.0 >> for version 3.0. >> The projects I work on for my company have either moved to >> Java 6.0, or in >> the case of one of them, are migrating to Java 5.0. In any >> case, one of the >> reasons we do not utilize commons-lang is its lack of >> Generics. I believe >> the project is highly useful and would be greatly improved >> with Java 5.0 >> Generics, varargs, and annotations, but the developer site >> still mentions >> targeting 1.2. Has anything been ratified about the use of >> Java 5.0? I don't >> see many commits to svn. Is commons-lang still being >> maintained or improved? >> I've read mention of a LangTwo branch in the repository, >> but I couldn't find >> it. Does this branch still exist? I would love to help >> contribute to bring >> the project up to Java 5.0 if this is indeed the path. >> >> Any information at all would be greatly appreciated. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -Michael >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org