Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-113234-apmail-commons-dev-archive=commons.apache.org@commons.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 65785 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2009 14:31:36 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2009 14:31:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 26487 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2009 14:31:30 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 26421 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2009 14:31:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@commons.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@commons.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.commons.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 26407 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2009 14:31:30 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:31:30 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates
 209.85.217.161 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.217.161] (HELO mail-gx0-f161.google.com)
 (209.85.217.161)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:31:22 +0000
Received: by gxk5 with SMTP id 5so2342623gxk.18
        for <dev@commons.apache.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=p57LrYfKmlJs7bQetb1Im7FnpsHJKlNp6QYkLS+r4p0=;
        b=vXLqVromH4dvmZG8l88hqbg8lGVpErKro0vR+EYlT+bNTnpwUafrAEU7wPHwuOkUO2
         3idHb/OnOk+rDCeO+KXP1gsLM1L6AjYC1VrDljGcucyy3QqYJGMCNZPDiOp/y6nabjbZ
         pRWj9HgIRemiyaCmC7qYO5qlEenc4g/grTGFY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=chLls73ZQOs2j0LFaXzccR2OCukDtxp8IeTC24TdMjlC8cYzhenk/axeEBahskrYR0
         teX+nLy0Ed9u89gmOTrpRJt7yOxoSSdmxwhiWXEgpOKKD4dmpE3Apbn8/6JZOOiS38zU
         MaxUOLnOQM8oiMRaQeDyb2Cbt0tvwaUjWxT8g=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.133.13 with SMTP id g13mr6561047ybd.232.1237559461634;
	Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <49C3AFAD.1010108@boboco.ie>
References: <25aac9fc0903180851n7c8c6875waeea71313ce6696d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <31cc37360903192238u13424739o96beedb5d83451cd@mail.gmail.com>
	 <b9e663070903200458q4d0b3803g1d912d40e9dc0e99@mail.gmail.com>
	 <25aac9fc0903200653j6226a006ka98419476c15a128@mail.gmail.com>
	 <49C3AFAD.1010108@boboco.ie>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:31:01 +0000
Message-ID: <25aac9fc0903200731w5bab751alb84409db0438a638@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LANG] 3.0 JCIP Annotations
From: sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 20/03/2009, Eric Bowman <ebowman@boboco.ie> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 20/03/2009, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > The Maven folks verified that putting a dependency in
> > >  <scope>provided</scope> will not create a runtime dependency. This
> > >  should equal a compile-only scope.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > The problem with that is that the developer has to provide the
> > annotation jar in order to run the compile. This is an extra stage.
> > I'm not sure what it involves.
> >
> > If we can find a method to automate the provision process within the
> > Maven build, then that would work. Otherwise, we are just making it
> > awkward for developers.
> >
> >
> >
>
>  This seems like a missing piece in maven.  There should be a scope that
> covers exactly this case, like "compileNotRuntime" or something like that.
>

My bad, sorry.

The scope "provided" is what is required.

I misunderstood the documentation to mean that the user had to provide
the jar at compile-time, however it only requires the user to provide
the jar at run-time.

"provided" does cause Maven to check the repository at compile-time,
which should solve the Maven issues raised in the thread.

I have now tried it (after I deleted jar from repo) and it all worked well.
Sorry for the noise.

>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org