Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44477 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2009 23:21:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2009 23:21:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 2424 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2009 23:21:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 2342 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2009 23:21:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 2331 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2009 23:21:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:21:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.186] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:20:54 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e27so713789nfd.30 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:20:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fr9a33jgr21BtB/wg3jr+2Ueo9S1eJKp4dgvdmBa7cU=; b=rJnFFCasZMjnn5WltAOhyCL6joih6bx8HTiwVIEVdahfyp7Y7nqnAEknJBga91HWTf VUKI8duQCwdBLaVz/XOGHJ9bcm6OGgPqwJv6kpql0Tns0Rb+LxJCrOVhZ77sR8mZqSA5 QhdCq4JFk5A7HbFVHf9WgiD6EMzxduHkJutlw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SD84wwZq6hpRQTAWSc5aE01quftAxsc9E2K1XH88uOyUcldlasr+q7OSS84DIZVaW1 dW/VISdlojYBRHmdYKadFhwvV3e788TTaszsSpYvOvjoElVZ1MI4D0POJw0vC7/78xvb 70hbkj8wwfdZ1DabbTdwwykkna9tPkmpdL7nI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.35.17 with SMTP id i17mr2234447ebi.81.1237072834483; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:20:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <31cc37360903140221w1550ea88w8661d281615bd6aa@mail.gmail.com> <25aac9fc0903140451s669fd9dcy5d429b1bb52f18eb@mail.gmail.com> <94C476C03BFF5E42AC3518FDAC9643C4D043C0B28B@HQMAIL.rocketsoftware.com> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:20:34 +0000 Message-ID: <25aac9fc0903141620h55825932ide6bd87856041229@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out From: sebb To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 14/03/2009, J=F6rg Schaible wrote: > Gary Gregory wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 4:52 AM > >> To: Commons Developers List > >> Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out > >> > > > >> > And the various other backwards incompatible changes that people ha= ve > >> > been requesting. > >> > >> Removal of AllxxxTest classes that just group other tests. > >> These just tend to get out of date, potentially complicate the POM, > >> and IMO don't offer much added value. > > > > -1 > > > > I use package-level test suites all the time from Eclipse. Running all > > tests in a given package is a very reasonable thing to do IMO. Otherwi= se I > > am forced to the command line where I often cannot ask Ant or Maven to > > even run tests in a given package. I am stuck with whatever the build'= s > > test target does. Not only that but I'd have to sit through a build ev= ery > > time... > > > Especially with Eclipse there's no need. Open the context menu of the > package and select run as unit test (or the project to run all tests at > once). For me those AllXxxxTest suites are simply annoying. > And it's very easy to miss out a test - I've just found out that ShortPrefixToStringStyleTest is not in the BuilderTestSuite. As it happens, one of its tests fails, so when I used Eclipse to run everything (at least twice, because of the suites - yuk!) I found the missing test class. There may be other missing tests - who knows? - and it's quite tedious finding out. > - J=F6rg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org