commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: [DBUTILS] Version numbering
Date Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:16:58 GMT
Yep, branches are cheap.  This is a good approach!

On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> My strategy with Lang btw is to just develop it and see what the API
> looks like at the end. We spend too much time worrying about the
> version number up front :)
>
> Hen
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Liam Coughlin <lscoughlin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That makes a little more sense then how I read the Stephen originally, and
>> yes you're probably right -- though I don't think you're going to be able to
>> get much varargs in without wrecking binary anyway since a lot of the
>> parameter ordering doesn't lend itself to it.
>>
>> I just don't feel that a 1.3 java 5 "Now with Special Sauce but  the Same
>> Old Hamburger" release would be all that useful in the long run, but i could
>> be completely wrong.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -L
>>
>>
>>
>> n@fabulich.com <dan@fabulich.com>> wrote:
>>> > "NEEDS" is a little strong....  I think there's room in the world for a
>>> > backwards-compatible dbutils 1.3 with generics and varargs followed
>>> shortly
>>> > afterward by a more thoroughly re-worked dbutils 2.0.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message