commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DBUTILS] Version numbering
Date Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:35:21 GMT
My strategy with Lang btw is to just develop it and see what the API
looks like at the end. We spend too much time worrying about the
version number up front :)

Hen

On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Liam Coughlin <lscoughlin@gmail.com> wrote:
> That makes a little more sense then how I read the Stephen originally, and
> yes you're probably right -- though I don't think you're going to be able to
> get much varargs in without wrecking binary anyway since a lot of the
> parameter ordering doesn't lend itself to it.
>
> I just don't feel that a 1.3 java 5 "Now with Special Sauce but  the Same
> Old Hamburger" release would be all that useful in the long run, but i could
> be completely wrong.
>
> Cheers,
> -L
>
>
>
> n@fabulich.com <dan@fabulich.com>> wrote:
>> > "NEEDS" is a little strong....  I think there's room in the world for a
>> > backwards-compatible dbutils 1.3 with generics and varargs followed
>> shortly
>> > afterward by a more thoroughly re-worked dbutils 2.0.
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message