Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-111967-apmail-commons-dev-archive=commons.apache.org@commons.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 55844 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2009 04:11:07 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2009 04:11:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 83067 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2009 04:11:06 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 82975 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2009 04:11:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@commons.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@commons.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.commons.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 82964 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2009 04:11:06 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:11:06 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rahul.akolkar@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.170.186 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.170.186] (HELO rn-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.170.186)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 04:10:58 +0000
Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k36so5425763rnd.1
        for <dev@commons.apache.org>; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:10:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=zewTKHwE3mSzAaBWdqerXUvKsfqChqCz8MI2xEcCv9I=;
        b=U5FM2XUNXifd5Auwm/OR8CtErmJlWmfCUDHuVwYXAC6x6MbbKnQrhtHZU783SH3m2A
         x2xVLJWGkCUCNALu+335jr0TfDZrapgBfVvfK4BMZnz00rK9pwXWWugp3tNpahsWL7nx
         k3KyYqq+aE5sKJ/mXxrUG61nxRAtOZK5S4El4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=ILX1quzEzvdX5dTbohJ9TuDNyMX3H9fV0JxabYPxKdEIhLXR2dToqBXBkM9dvJvtY6
         DsLyisdgJB5QpTTJhn3Kbs6ZjuD8jl/tSD7CG64wePIkOdTOPq/xXhDBs1ZkWB9cvP6S
         Eojy1U3ex4/qQ2j/4XYcwVDvjIS9o7tNPxIig=
Received: by 10.150.196.5 with SMTP id t5mr18686726ybf.238.1230955837757;
        Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:10:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.151.154.3 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:10:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <ce1f2ea80901022010r300c1ed0lf86b9bd016b8b86b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 23:10:37 -0500
From: "Rahul Akolkar" <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com>
To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [SCXML] Deprecations in J6 branch (was: svn commit: r730816)
In-Reply-To: <25aac9fc0901021531u14440d46n3e87870c7e491a61@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <ce1f2ea80901021129r710a0cf9n60b54ccbc7754f05@mail.gmail.com>
	 <25aac9fc0901021531u14440d46n3e87870c7e491a61@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:31 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 2:03 PM,  <sebb@apache.org> wrote:
>>  > Author: sebb
>>  > Date: Fri Jan  2 11:03:42 2009
>>  > New Revision: 730816
>>  >
>>  > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730816&view=rev
>>  > Log:
>>  > Add missing @Deprecated annotations
>>  >
>>  <snip/>
>>
>>  Which reminds me -- these deprecated fields and methods can simply
>>  disappear from the J6 branch. The branch will result in a major
>>  release whenever that happens since it has higher JDK requirements as
>>  compared to trunk (amongst other reasons).
>>
>>  Some of the methods may be used elsewhere and if so, require a bit of
>>  thought but the constants should be easy to remove if you'd like.
>>
>
> OK, I've removed all the unused deprecated methods and fields.
>
<snip/>

Thanks for that. Though I'm now getting 75 failures and 4 errors (mvn
test). Will take a look now to see whats going on.


> There are still a few deprecated methods to sort out.
>
<snap/>

OK, will look at these later (after the weekend).

-Rahul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org