commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sujit Pal <sujit....@comcast.net>
Subject Re: [math] Shoud OpenIntToDoubleHashMap get return NaN instead of 0 for key not found?
Date Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:56:55 GMT
If OpenIntToDoubleHashMap returns NaN for non-existent keys, then the 
Sparse Matrix could check for NaN to return 0 to its client.

-sujit

Phil Steitz wrote:
> I am still working through this class and the sparse matrix class that 
> it was extracted from (thanks, Ismael and Sugit!), so I am not sure if 
> changing this would cause problems, but the current setup (returning 0 
> for missing keys) limits usefulness of this class.   I see how this is 
> convenient for sparse matrices; but I would see NaN as a more natural 
> return value for non-existent keys in the general case.  
> Alternatively,  I guess we could add another method get(int key, 
> double missingReturn).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Phil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message