commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John Spackman" <john.spack...@zenesis.com>
Subject Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/FederatedCommons
Date Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:28:13 GMT
Hi Russel,

>Of course graceful demise is entirely appropriate.  The question I have
>is whether putting effort into maintaining a demising system is worth it
>compared to putting that effort into transferring to a different (more
>appropriate, in my view) technology for dealing with the problem.  There
>are some very nice candidates for Ant and Maven replacements out there:

I think you're talking about a different "problem" - Jelly is used for far 
more than Ant/Maven replacement (I don't usually use either) and maintaining 
it is not an altruistic choice for me, but a practical one because I find it 
so very useful.

John

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Russel Winder" <russel.winder@concertant.com>
To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/FederatedCommons





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message