Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37689 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2008 14:27:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2008 14:27:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 44774 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 14:27:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 44677 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 14:27:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 44664 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2008 14:27:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:27:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.144 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.144] (HELO ey-out-1920.google.com) (74.125.78.144) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:26:44 +0000 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so1079361eyg.60 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:27:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=84UDVZVgJNYQIfHagImrll09IB63vqzN71QP3esj+dI=; b=O41lmnY+Q6SdreEwOJ10n/p/+UUdm9UgA9b8z/9sHhIzp5lAD5BzXItna9XMzjegaB BlrQ0GXCF4nA7tbv4jcAh0YHKLWLIGiBZORBfXHqpCr6Qilb8KHxl7jo6GqI69SSEoMI ZfcRuK/VAxV73PNGHqCCOAlBf0cP8nTXL5y4k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=rRutZDZVWOcNH/hRcA5cbKs+SA4yRwPDOBnYI0GNE9e3AlXQ9+uxfsP8/RukQaZSSU zUlKeEidMz4pFF91kSLtUBtWO702Zw2QFAvETgGkwya1Nk2623SsgF4CtjdaCHKMzMDz 7lFI/lw8IJBnxxkvvu4wgaLE9dfB8bggEvy4M= Received: by 10.86.29.8 with SMTP id c8mr6074753fgc.23.1223389621513; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.1.2 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <25aac9fc0810070727m1ad258c7u1f922f536b2eb96c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:27:01 +0100 From: sebb To: "Commons Developers List" , vgoenka@apache.org Subject: Re: [JEXL] - 1.1.1 release? In-Reply-To: <20081007062412.6ADC2340D05@mail.bortnet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081007062412.6ADC2340D05@mail.bortnet.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org No patch seen here. Please create a JIRA issue and attach the patch(es) to that. Patches to mailing lists may get overlooked - or lost, as has apparently happened here On 07/10/2008, Vishal Goenka wrote: > Please find a patch for the ASTBlock statement bug. I will follow up with > jUnit test case as well as a patch for the other issue I identified earlier > as time permits. > > Thanks. > > > - Vishal > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:rahul.akolkar@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:38 PM > To: Commons Developers List; vgoenka@apache.org > Subject: Re: [JEXL] - 1.1.1 release? > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Vishal Goenka wrote: > > I have been using JEXL 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT for a few months now in a production > > environment to leverage the array and map support. Except for two issues > > that I sent out to the mailing list (see below) things are working great > for > > me and I was wondering if a 1.1.1 release may be in the offing anytime > soon. > > > > > Nothing has been discussed on the list. The last activity we've seen > is some enhancements from dIon a couple of weeks ago, and there have > been enough changes to warrant a new release IMO. So, it may depend on > how much interest you (and others) have in seeing a release and > getting the odds and ends in to help out. > > > > Here are the issues that I found: > > > > [JEXL] - Block statements aren't parsed - Patch submitted on 9/3/08 > > > > > I glanced at that email again. Can you please provide a real patch? > The copying two lines part wouldn't generally be a problem, but its > been a busy month so far. A JUnit test case to match would be super. > > > > [JEXL] - Last argument of a method invoked via JEXL cannot declare an > array > > as expected - Submitted a workaround. Will be happy to fix and submit a > > patch. > > > > > That'd be great, thanks. > > -Rahul > > > > - Vishal > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org