commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Carman" <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Release commons-net 2.0
Date Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:01:45 GMT
How about sending out a fresh [vote] thread email again?  I don't tend
to keep stuff around and it's hard to know what we're voting on when
new versions of the rc keep getting uploaded.  If you're cutting a new
release candidate, I'd say you should upload it, but don't overwrite
what you put out there before (you should have directories for -rc1,
-rc2, etc).  Are you cutting new release candidate each time (with new
tags)?  Each time the bits change, you should send out a new vote
thread asking us to vote on that particular version.

On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Rory Winston <rory.winston@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guys
>
> I know commons has been dying a slow death due to inactivity, but binding
> votes (either +-1) would be appreciated. I want to get this out finally...
>
> Rory Winston wrote:
>>
>> Ah, yes, you're right.... -Prc does actually generate them automatically.
>> That explains the discrepancy.
>>
>> I have uploaded the distribution again, based on the build with a -Prc
>> switch. It's exactly the same, just the javadoc/src jar is generated by the
>> parent pom automagically.
>>
>> James Carman wrote:
>>>
>>> Does Net's pom not extend the proper parent pom?  For Proxy, most of
>>> the proper build stuff was taken care of for me by the hard work that
>>> others put into the parent pom (thanks to those folks).  Did you try
>>> using the "rc" profile when cutting your release candidates?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Jörg Schaible
>>> <Joerg.Schaible@scalaris.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> jcarman@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/1/08, Rory Winston <rory.winston@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the feedback. I have changed the pom (needed to add some
>>>>>> plugins) to generate sources and javadoc jars. I have uploaded the
>>>>>> signed jars to the site. I dont see an issue with the javadocs
>>>>>> containing the examples classes (its always been like that).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rory
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn't the Parent pom take care of this?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That was my impression also ...
>>>>
>>>> - Jörg
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message