Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64914 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2008 12:14:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2008 12:14:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 83026 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2008 12:14:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 82954 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2008 12:14:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 82943 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2008 12:14:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:14:29 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.158.181.16] (HELO server172-han.de-nserver.de) (85.158.181.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:13:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 10464 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2008 14:13:48 +0200 Received: from mk084020180004.a1.net (HELO mk084020180004.a1.net) (84.20.180.4) (smtp-auth username siegfried.goeschl@it20one.com, mechanism plain) by server172-han.de-nserver.de (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:13:48 +0200 Message-ID: <4857AA7E.7000700@it20one.at> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:13:50 +0200 From: Siegfried Goeschl Reply-To: siegfried.goeschl@it20one.at Organization: IT20one GmbH User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper References: <48527A51.9060604@it20one.at> <55afdc850806130944k4d981bber37f505c7c85c5cac@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55afdc850806130944k4d981bber37f505c7c85c5cac@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-User-Auth: Auth by siegfried.goeschl@it20one.com through 84.20.180.4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Niall, I only have the same response I wrote six months ago ... :-) +) I can't make any promises but commons-exec is small enough to be maintained in the small hours when the family is asleep +) I'm not expecting a huge user base - it's too late for that since many in-house libraries are already used +) I'm not expecting many bugs because the original ANT while not perfect is still a solid foundation +) I think that one or two commons developers will use the code and might provide additional support if needed And I still think that commons-exec is a valuable addition to commons proper because it is hard to write such a component running on various OS/JVM installations ... Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Siegfried Goeschl > wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN >> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving >> commons-exec to commons proper?! >> >> The current state of the commons-exec >> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/) >> >> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have the >> karma to mess up the project ... :-) >> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007 >> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression >> tests >> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs >> +) removed commons-logging dependency >> +) added a few more features plus regression tests >> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on various >> platforms and JVMs (see >> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html) >> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008 >> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user >> community >> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year >> >> The not so good things >> >> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on OpenVMS >> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical >> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code >> > > It sounds like exec is pretty much ready to start thinking about a > release? If thats the case then we should be promoting it (if not then > theres not much point in moving out of the Sandbox IMO). > > We have other components with only one active person so IMO its not a > blocker. For me I would hope there is an intention on your part to > stick around and support it - I'm not looking for any kind of promise, > since none of us know what the future holds and were all volunteers > that can disappear at any time - but I would be happier (voting to > promote) if I knew the intention was there. > > Niall > > >> Thanks in advance >> >> Siegfried Goeschl >> >> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available >> .... >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org