Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50116 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2008 06:47:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jun 2008 06:47:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 41406 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2008 06:47:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 41329 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2008 06:47:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 41317 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2008 06:47:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:47:31 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ralph.goers@dslextreme.com designates 66.51.199.94 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.51.199.94] (HELO mail9.dslextreme.com) (66.51.199.94) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 06:46:41 +0000 Received: (qmail 21046 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2008 06:46:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.10.129]) (66.51.196.164) by mail9.dslextreme.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:46:58 -0700 Message-ID: <4850C65A.5070104@dslextreme.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:46:50 -0700 From: Ralph Goers Reply-To: rgoers@apache.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [lang] Java 5 References: <375586.71165.qm@web55108.mail.re4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I haven't been following this list all that long so I'm interested in knowing why you want the package names changed. (I apologize in advance to those who have already heard this before). BTW - I'm +1 on Java 5. Not only for lang but for a bunch of commons projects. James Carman wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > >> There is a JIRA item for using generics, and another >> for varargs. Additionally it'd probably be nice to >> use generics-level reflection in the oacl.reflect >> package. Thoughts on [lang] 3.0 moving to Java 5 >> source level? >> > > +1, but I think we need to consider changing the package names (I know > you folks are sick of me saying that) if the API is going to change > that drastically. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org