commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niall Pemberton" <niall.pember...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC2
Date Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:40:42 GMT
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Niall Pemberton <niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Matt Benson
>> <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks, Seb.
>>
>> I changed the m1 build to use JUnit 3.8.1 and add
>> the new dependency
>> for mockrruner:
>
> Niall, I apologize for having failed to express my
> appreciation of this assistance.  :)  But then you
> busted my chops on #asf, so maybe we're even... ;)

Hey np and sorry :)

>>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=657477
>>
>> Two tests continue to fail under JDK 1.3 (but pass
>> using JDK 1.4)
>>
>
> Yep, these are fixed now.
>
> [SNIP]
>
> I think that's all the outstanding issues.  If we are
> intellectually aware that the Ant and M1 builds work
> on 1.3 and that the maven.compile.source and target
> are set to 1.3 (inherited from commons-parent), does
> anyone have any further issue with my preparing RCs
> (if I can even remember how 1.5 months later) on 1.5
> (OS X, remember)?

Go for it.

Niall

> Thanks,
> Matt
>
>
>>
>> Niall
>>
>>
>> > -Matt
>> >
>> > --- sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Found my e-mail; the JUnit problem is that:
>> >>
>> >> JUnit 3.8.2 contains a 1.4+ method call:
>> >>
>> >>     Boolean.valueOf(boolean)
>> >>
>> >> This is used by the methods:
>> >>
>> >>   assertEquals([String message,] boolean
>> expected,
>> >> boolean actual)
>> >>
>> >> I don't know if there are any other 1.4+ method
>> >> calls in 3.8.2.
>> >>
>> >> 3.8.1 does seem to be compatible with 1.3.
>> >>
>> >> 2008/5/2 Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com>:
>> >> > Due to more issues having been found, this vote
>> is
>> >> >  also cancelled.  Thanks!
>> >> >
>> >> >  -Matt
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >  --- Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >  > First, thanks to all those who checked and
>> >> found
>> >> >  > issues with RC1!
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > The artifacts are here:
>> >> >  >
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc2/
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > The tag is here:
>> >> >  >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jxpath/tags/JXPATH_1_3_RC2/
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > Site:
>> >> >  >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc2/site
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > Clirr Report (compared to 1.2; one-shot not
>> >> working
>> >> >  > w/
>> >> >  > M2)
>> >> >  >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc2/clirr-report.txt
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > I'd be grateful if you can make time to
>> check
>> >> the
>> >> >  > artifacts and cast your vote, which will be
>> >> open at
>> >> >  > least until Friday, May 9.
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > Thanks,
>> >> >  > Matt
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message