commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tom Schindl <lis...@bestsolution.at>
Subject Re: [lang] Java 5
Date Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:23:29 GMT
I think we should ask the felix people what can be solved with OSGi and 
what can not.

Tom

simon.kitching@chello.at schrieb:
> Tom Schindl schrieb:
>> I can feel your pain. Thank god I'm using OSGi and can declare my
>> dependencies explicitly :-)
> 
> Yep. Well, it works for those libs that are just internal implementation
> details.
> 
> I'm not an OSGi expert, but if any exported class contains a public or
> protected method that has type T as a parameter or return type, then
> aren't you again locked into a single application-wide version of the
> lib that provides T?
> 
> If so, then OSGi will solve problems for things like ASM which are
> usually pure internal details, but will not solve problems for things
> like commons libs whose types are commonly part of another lib's
> exported API (lang.enums.Enum, lang.math.DoubleRange, etc)...
> 
> Regards,
> Simon
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message